|
Henry's chief advisor, Thomas, Cardinal Wolsey. We take our info from historian Peter Gwyn not Mantel's Wolf Hall.
Did Henry break with Rome in order to seize power over the wealthy, ubiquitous church in England?
Many notable historians say that Henry VIII’s decision to break with Rome and take over the Church in England was in order to give himself significantly more power over his subjects. It’s a very persuasive argument.
It’s certainly a much more satisfying explanation than the lovesick Henry of popular tradition.
If we believe that Henry’s real aim in these years was imperium (a bid for absolute power – ruling like a Roman Emperor) what we imply is that he was perhaps rather cynically using his divorce as a device to challenge the power of the pope, and so to seize power over the church in England, and to give himself significantly more power over his kingdom than any previous monarch.
Well at first glance this imperium line of argument seems to work very well.
After all, at the start of his reign, in 1515, a 24 yr old Henry certainly made a bid, if not to take over the Church in England, at the very least to rule it much more directly than monarchs had before. After a bad-tempered debate with the church’s law courts, Henry ominously declared that ‘kings of England in time past have never had any superior but God only.’
But then the next year Henry stopped threatening the church and for more than ten years he played the role of Rome’s loyal son. Why?
Well, the reason is that his Chancellor Thomas Wolsey, who was also archbishop, cardinal and papal legate (that’s the pope’s representative) ran both church and state for him, effectively already gave Henry complete power in England.
But in the mid 1520s Wolsey’s power in England began to wane, and we believe Henry chose to pick a new and very personal quarrel with the church.
|
|
The spark that lit the fire of Henry's split with Rome
|
|
|
|
|