The Secret History of the Suffragettes

- Episode 02 -

Most women didn’t want the vote

The Secret History of the Suffragettes
Wednesday 2 March 2022
Why the Suffragettes were founded LISTEN

Dr Elizabeth Garrett Anderson, 1836-1917, first woman member of British Medical Association

In spite of general public indifference, the campaign for female emancipation was making progress by 1903 when the Pankhursts set up the Suffragettes (WSPU)

There were vigorous debates in the 1890s on the future of marriage – a few couples were removing the ‘obey’ business from their vows and merging their surnames. And there was a movement – admittedly among a tiny few – for free love and open relationships.  Women could vote in parliamentary elections in New Zealand from 1893 and various parts of Australia from 1899.

Women had won the right to a basic education, and to vote for, and sit on local Education Boards. There were Girls’ High Schools in most towns. From 1869 Colleges for women opened in Oxford and Cambridge.

In 1873 the first woman, Elizabeth (Garrett) Anderson (who was Millicent Fawcett’s sister), became a member of the British Medical Association. Later she would be England’s first woman mayor in Aldeburgh. In 1875 women could sit on the Boards of Guardians that cared for the poor. In 1888 the first woman (Eliza Orme) gained a law degree – though outrageously it wasn’t until 1922 that the first woman was actually allowed to become a practising solicitor.

The press however, with the exception of the Manchester Guardian, took very little notice of votes for women. Historian Anita Sama believes this indifference may well be a significant barometer of the a much wider lack of interest in women’s votes. 

Which may be why in 1906 newly elected Liberal Prime Minister Campbell-Bannerman told a roomful of women campaigners that they had made a ‘conclusive and irrefutable case’ and that they should go on ‘pestering’. He, however, clearly intended to do nothing about it. Sounds like the Catholic Church and women priests!


 

Gertrude Bell, 1868-1926, writer, traveller, political officer, administrator, who worked alongside Lawrence of Arabia

By 1914, the number of women actively campaigning against women voting in Parliamentary elections was pretty much the same as those campaigning for it
 
Gertrude Bell was one of the first graduates from Lady Margaret Hall in Oxford, and went on not only to become an archaeologist but also a photographer, translator and cartographer. She was the first person to climb Mont Blanc and several other Alpine peaks, on one occasion waiting out a blizzard for two days dangling on a rope. She played a large role in founding modern Iraq and worked with Lawrence of Arabia. She was the first woman officer in British Intelligence.

Gertrude Bell could not be described as a shrinking violet. But she energetically opposed votes for women – even in the Church of England. A formidable study by historian Julia Bush - Women against the vote - shows that, by 1914, the number of women actively campaigning against women voting in Parliamentary elections was pretty much the same as those campaigning for it.
 
Another example was Annie Moberly, who was the Manager of the Times’s cousin, and founder of St Hugh’s College, Oxford. She too wanted nothing to do with women’s votes and influenced many of her students.
 
These women were what we nowadays call ‘difference feminists.’ They crisply and articulately made the point that they wanted to be recognised as equal but different. And they had no interest at all in voting.

Episode 2 Why were the Suffragettes founded? on Apple podcast here 

Episode 2 Why were the Suffragettes founded?   on Soundcloud here 

Episode 2 Why were the Suffragettes founded? on Spotify here 

How to persuade a government it has more to lose by not giving women the vote?
Harriet Taylor, 1807-1858, philosopher, credited with converting her MP and philosopher husband John Stuart Mill to female suffrage [National Portrait Gallery]

Were the Suffragettes founded in 1903 to rescue the campaign for women's votes?

The Suffragettes, the Women's Social and Political Union, was founded in 1903 in Manchester initially to help secure better conditions for female workers in the local cotton industry. 

The usual story is that when Emmeline Pankhurst took the Suffragettes to London in 1905 and embarked on a militant campaign, she was doing this because the decades long campaign for women's votes had run out of steam. But a majority of MPs were consistently in favour. All that was left to do was to convince a government. And as soon as the Suffragettes became violent they made that impossible. They forced the government even more firmly into opposing female suffrage. They lost their majority support among the MPs, and they even made it harder for suffragists internationally who complained bitterly.

Which is why when we’re told that it was the Suffragettes who finally made votes for women an urgent question that British politicians had to face, we have to say we don’t think that’s true.

The impetus for accelerating change - whether peacefully or not - came largely from single, middle-class women. The census in 1851 had confirmed what everybody already knew. There were more women in the United Kingdom than men. Now this mattered because it was difficult for women to get jobs to support themselves. Not so much working-class women, who had, throughout history, laboured in manufacturing, at home or in workshops and were now, at least in some of the northern towns, crowding into the new mills. 
 
Edith Olivier, 1872-1948, instrumental in the women's Land Army in WW1, and author of The Love Child about a spinster's imaginary child who comes to life

Winning the vote was connected with opening up job opportunities for single women and improving social conditions for all 

The job crisis was amongst single women in the growing middle-class, or married women who hoped to do something different from housework. The only jobs available were governess, teacher or seamstress. The point is that, without a job, or without a husband or a well-to-do family to subsidise you, middle-class women faced destitution.

In 1894 Penelope's great great aunt Edith Olivier was hoping to get a place at Oxford, although her father wouldn’t pay for her to go, being a woman. He only paid for her brothers to go. She wrote in her journal ‘if I am not married, I must earn my living. At present I am absolutely unqualified.’ Even in 1894, Edith Olivier knew she would probably have little choice but to marry, or become a governess, a teacher or a seamstress. 

Edith Olivier had finally succeeded in studying at St Hugh's, Oxford run by Annie Moberly and, like her principal, opposed votes for women. But for many women the solution was obtaining the vote and using their political influence to improve social conditions for the working-class and to extend career opportunities for all.

And to do this, they had to make the Government of the day believe that it had more to gain from giving women the vote than to lose.

This is what the Pankhurst WSPU set out to do in 1905. In our series we explain why they failed, and how others succeeded.
View All Episodes
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Spotify
Email
Copyright © 2024 History Cafe, All rights reserved.