What Wars? What Roses?

- Episode 05-

Extortioners and hatchet men

Extortioners and hatchet men
9 April 2024
All History Café links
NEW SERIES What Wars? What Roses?
[painting] Henry VII with his two most notorious lawyer thugs [L-R] Richard Empson, Henry VII, Edmund Dudley

Henry VII used intimidation and entrapment to keep his nobles in line

Henry VII’s financial manoeuvres are a subject in themselves. But in summary, he used legal tools – which he exploited but didn’t in fact invent – to put anyone with any money under the threat of huge fines if they stepped out of line.

He also shifted the machinery of government away from the nobility and other landowners and into the hands of professional administrators – not to say extortioners, gangsters and hatchet men.
 
The most notorious of them were two lawyers Richard Empson and Edmund Dudley. Empson stacked juries and intimidated judges, or simply sent the heavies round to get what he wanted. Dudley ran a protection racket in London that was worthy of Al Capone.
 
Dudley’s house on Candlewick Street was the centre of a mafia of so-called ‘promoters’, including a number of Italian bankers, who would sniff out – not to say actually provoke – fraud in the city and then trap their victims until they paid.

By the time Henry VII died THREE London mayors were in the Tower for getting on the wrong side of the king's hatchet men.
 
[illumination] Medieval illustration of serfs harvesting wheat with reaping-hooks or sickles, with overseer or Reeve

The Black Death led to a labour shortage and the rise of the bully-proof Yeoman farmer

The economic effects of the Black Death are, as you will imagine, complex and much debated. But, simplifying for the sake of clarity, by the 1390s it was difficult to make big money from farming.

The land - which had previously supported a much larger population - was producing far too much food, so that prices fell. Labour was scarce and the few labourers there now were, could command high wages. By the end of the century there was simply too much land to go round and it was becoming easier and easier to rent on favourable terms if you were a farmer.

By the 1430s ‘Yeomen’ were widely regarded as men with more than about 40 acres of land. They often rented land from several different estates and that made it a great deal harder to bully them around than their peasant fathers and grandfathers.

Even farmers with only 10-40 acres were showing ‘a sturdy self-sufficiency’. These were coming to be known as ‘husbandmen.’

Even those with fewer than 10 acres were able to prosper, as prices for the things they couldn’t grow themselves were low and so were rents.

Even the landless were doing well. The average pay for female labourers for example jumped from just over a penny a day, before the Black Death, to over twopence-halfpenny a day, fifty years later.
 
It's official - after 600 years we're back to a Feudal Society!

 

[illustration] The Great Barn at Wolfhall which burned down in 1920s mentioned in Edward Seymour's account book 'Paid to Cornish the paynter for divers colours by him bought, for making certain frets & antiques on canvas for my Lord’s barn and house at Wulf Haull agains the king’s coming thether. 9th Aug 1535'

The last gasp of a declining inter-related nobility

The period known as the Wars of the Roses now looks like the last gasp of a nobility sharply reduced in size, unhealthily interrelated, split by long-running feuds, and – above all – losing its authority in local society.

No wonder therefore that Henry VII was able to treat the nobility with so much contempt.

English society, now much smaller, much less at the mercy of wealthy landlords, had significantly ‘thickened’ out. The gap between wealthy landowners and peasant farmers – never quite the yawning gulf we were taught at school – had been filled by prosperous husbandmen and yeomen, who were tilling larger and larger farms, increasingly for profit, and those with a few more acres still who were becoming known as ‘gentlemen.’

The Tudors would be able to give these individuals more and more tasks, running local justice and the relief of the poor.
 
The ‘nobles’ who began to hang around the Tudor court – like the Seymours or the Cecils – were a new set, mostly just country gentry who had done well for themselves and found a way into royal employment.

#96 Extortioners and hatchet men - Ep 5 What Wars? What Roses?


 
[diagram] Yes we're back to a feudal society in the UK (unfortunately the only diagram we could find is rather old and American)

What came before this ‘modern’ England had often been poverty and lawlessness, much of it caused by feuding, self-centred nobility who were supposed to be in charge.

What came after, with the Victorians, was the arrival of centralised, bureaucratic government. And centralised, bureaucratic government brought with it sustained decline and, more recently, the re-emergence of a gap between rich and poor of medieval proportions.

The consequence has been the re-appearance, after more than 500 years, of political gangsterism among Britain’s too-wealthy and over-powerful politicians. Once again, Britain is on the way to becoming a feudal society.

ChatGPT joke based on this episode. Rather too close to the bone, don't you think?

Q: Why did the medieval historian go to therapy?

A:  Because they realized Britain's political scene was starting to look like a medieval soap opera again—full of power-hungry nobles, plots, and backstabbing!



Sir George Sitwell's tongue-in-cheek introduction to a gentleman: 'The premier gentleman of England is "Robert Ercleswyke of Stafford, gentilman"... He was charged at the Staffordshire Assizes with housebreaking, wounding with intent to kill, and procuring the murder of one Thomas Page, who was cut to pieces while on his knees begging for his life.' 
View All Episodes
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Spotify
Email
Copyright © 2024 History Cafe, All rights reserved.